Codekit sass change creator file Offline#
You can read more in detail about what this means in the Implementing Critical CSS on your website & ServiceWorkers and Offline Browsing articles, and more broadly the topic of website performance in the A Pretty Website Isn’t Enough & Creating Optimized Images in Craft CMS articles. In general, the websites that I work on follow the PRPL pattern, in that we want to load only what is needed to to render the initial “above the fold” web content, prefetch other likely needed resources, and then lazy load everything else asynchronously. Some things simply can’t be expressed as efficiently via a GUI, and there’s little chance it will be able to keep pace with the Node.js ecosystem. There is even a GUI tool called CodeKit that offers some nice functionality, but I think ultimately it will end up being the DreamWeaver of the frontend automation tool world. You could also just use npm scripts to execute the various Node.js modules directly, but I find the convenience layer that Gulp provides to be worth the tradeoff of another level of dependency. Gulp just adds an API and streaming layer on top that makes doing typical frontend builds easier. In the end, all of these tools (Gulp included) simply execute Node.js JavaScript packages on the command line. But similar to Laravel Mix, I prefer a bit more control over the build process when necessary.Īt some point, the layers upon layers ends up getting a bit silly as well. Viget has built a tool called Blendid! that uses a hybrid approach of utilizing both Gulp and webpack, and it looks pretty well done. I’ve found that it’s fantastic for bootstrapping projects, but whenever the project grows to any scale, its been necessary to have more control over the build process. There’s even Laravel Mix, which adds a layer on top of webpack. It’s also in general slower than Gulp for building things, due to its file-oriented approach. There’s also an older frontend workflow automation tool called Grunt, and it works fine, but it can be somewhat more verbose to configure. But for webpack to be used effectively, it really needs to be embraced whole-hog and used not just as a module bundler, but as a module loader as well.
Codekit sass change creator file portable#
And it’s portable from project to project, because of separation of concerns that puts the data into our package.json.įor JavaScript-centric projects that use React or Vue for JAMstack-style websites, you’ll inevitably want to use webpack, because of all of the scaffolding that exists around it, and advanced features like code splitting, hot module reloading, etc. …and a bit more too! But that’s a quick overview of what a workflow automation can do for you. Losslessly minimizes all of the the images our website uses via imagemin.Generates all of the various favicons for our website (and the HTML code for them) from a single source image.Generates a custom icon font using only the glyphs we use via Fontello.Runs an accessibility audit on our website.Generates CriticalCSS for our website.Changes to our Twig/HTML templates cause the browser to reload the page.JavaScript changes cause the browser to reload the page.CSS/ SCSS changes cause an immediate browser repaint without a page load.Pulls in any JavaScripts we need to inline in our HTML separately.Pulls in JavaScripts from any third-party modules/packages we use.Transpiles all of the JavaScript we write from ES 6 to something web browsers support.Pulls in CSS from any third-party modules/packages we use.Creates SourceMaps for our CSS to make debugging easy.Auto-prefixes our CSS for the browsers we support.Compiles all of our SCSS down to CSS, using a cache to make it faster.So what exactly does our Gulp frontend workflow automation do for us? Here’s a rundown:
0 kommentar(er)
